.jpg)
A Pine Siskin perches on a feeder. The species has moved its winter range northward about 288 miles. A marked increase has occurred in Alaska, while states like Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana are seeing smaller numbers. Photo by Glenn Tepke.
The National Audubon Society issued this press release today about the effects of climate change on birds. — M.M.
WASHINGTON, DC, February 10, 2009 - The northward and inland movement of North American birds, confirmed by thousands of citizen-observations, provides new and powerful evidence that global warming is having a serious impact on natural systems, according to new analyses by Audubon scientists. The findings signal the need for dramatic policy changes to combat pervasive ecological disruption.
Analyses of citizen-gathered data from the past 40 years of Audubon's Christmas Bird Count (CBC) reveal that 58 percent of the 305 widespread species that winter on the continent shifted significantly north since 1968, some by hundreds of miles. Movement was detected among species of every type, including more than 70 percent of highly adaptable forest and feeder birds. Only 38 percent of grassland species mirrored the trend, reflecting the constraints of their severely-depleted habitat and suggesting that they now face a double threat from the combined stresses of habitat loss and climate adaptation.
Population shifts among individual species are common, fluctuate, and can have many causes. However, Audubon scientists say the ongoing trend of movement by some 177 species-closely correlated to long-term winter temperature increases-reveals an undeniable link to the changing climate.
"Birds are showing us how the heavy hand of humanity is tipping the balance of nature and causing ecological disruption in ways we are just beginning to predict and comprehend," said report co-author and Audubon Director of Bird Conservation, Greg Butcher, Ph.D. "Common sense dictates that we act now to curb the causes and impacts of global warming to the extent we can, and shape our policies to better cope with the disruptions we cannot avoid."
The Red-breasted Merganser's overall northward movement of approximately 317 miles is driving winter populations up in Minnesota, for example, while its numbers in states like Kentucky and Nevada are substantially down over the last 40 years. Photo by Dave Menke/USFWS.
Movements across all species-including those not reflecting the 40 year trend-averaged approximately 35 miles during the period. However, it is the complete picture of widespread movement and the failure of some species to move at all that illustrate the potential for problems.
• Purple Finch, Pine Siskin, and Boreal Chickadee have retreated dramatically north into the Canadian Boreal, their ranges moving an estimated 433, 288, and 279 miles respectively over 40 years. Continuing warming and development are predicted to have adverse impacts on the boreal forest and the species that depend on it.
• Red-breasted Merganser, Ring-necked Duck, and American Black Duck, normally found in southern-tier states, have all taken advantage of warmer winter waters and have shifted their ranges north by an estimated 317, 219, and 182 miles. Still, they are likely to be negatively impacted by the increased drought expected in many parts of North America as global warming worsens.
• Only 10 of 26 grassland species moved north significantly, while nine moved south. Species such as Eastern Meadowlark, Vesper Sparrow, and Burrowing Owl were likely unable to move despite more moderate northern temperatures because essential grassland habitat areas have disappeared, having been converted to intensive human uses such as row crops, pastures, and hayfields. In combination, global warming and ongoing overuse of grasslands by humans will doom grassland birds to continued population declines.
"Experts predict that global warming will mean dire consequences, even extinction, for many bird species, and this analysis suggests that that the process leading down that path is already well underway," warned Audubon President John Flicker. "We're witnessing an uncontrolled experiment on the birds and the world we share with them."
Butcher explains that many birds move great distances to find suitable food and habitat, but questions how far they will be able to move in the face of climate change before they run out of habitat, food or even luck. "The long term picture is not good for many species, and even in the short term, a single harsh winter could have a devastating impact on birds that have moved too far," he adds.
The California Gnatcatcher occurs in a small area in southern California and Baja California. It faces significant range loss if warming trends continue. Photo by Dennis Ancinec.
New forward-looking research from Audubon California reinforces the national findings, predicting that about 80 of that state's native bird species will experience significant climate-driven reductions in their geographic range over coming decades.
Scientific models indicate that the magnitude of losses in California depends largely on steps taken now to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The California Gnatcatcher could lose as much as 56 percent of its range, or as little as 7 percent, depending on how climate change is addressed. Projected range losses for the Bay area's popular Chestnut-backed Chickadee vary from 49 percent to as little as 16 percent.
Detailed GIS maps produced using the California research project where the birds are likely to be in 50 to 100 years. Findings will help policymakers and land managers augment efforts to mitigate the severity of global warming impacts with better habitat conservation investments to address changes that can't be avoided.
The chart at right, from the Audubon report, shows the averages in northward range shift for the 305 species studied. Click on the chart to see it larger.
"The birds are giving us yet another warning that it's time for urgent action," added Flicker. "People hear about melting glaciers and changing weather, but now they can witness the impact global warming is having with the birds they see or don't see right outside their doors. These birds are our 'canaries in the coal mine' and they're telling us that we'd better do something fast to curb global warming and to protect habitat."
Critical steps citizens can take can be found online at Audubon.org and include signing a national petition demanding aggressive federal policy action. Habitat conservation efforts based on forward looking projections such as those from Audubon California are also essential.
Habitats already under siege from development, energy production and agricultural expansion and other human uses will require enhanced protection and restoration to sustain bird populations and provide ecological benefits essential to human health, economic prosperity and quality of life.
Audubon anticipates that the new avian evidence will help attract the attention and spark action among more than 40 million self-proclaimed U.S. bird-watchers, ten of thousands of whom contributed to the Christmas Bird Count data on which the studies are based. The 109-year-old census provides the world's longest uninterrupted record of bird population trends.
"Citizen Science is allowing us to better recognize the impacts that global warming is having here and now. Only citizen action can help us reduce them," said Butcher.
Read how climate change is affecting Carolina Wrens, Gray Jays, Adelie Penguins, and other birds.
I think you should realize that the report is more of a political scare report than a scientific report. Just like all the “science” we now hear about climate, it was a report of deception. Read about it here?
http://nofreewind.blogspot.com/2009/07/how-national-audubon-society-deceives_13.html
Some Main Points:
1. January instead of December temp data was used even though over 80% of the record are collected in December.
3. Report was written Feb 09, but 06-09 data was conveniently left out, because it was well below the trend.
4. January data from 1990-2009, the past 19yrs showed only minimal upward temp trend.
5. January temperatures from 1998-2009 are trending DRAMATICALLY downard!
6. January temperatures from 1953-1979 were dramatically DOWNWARD.
7. 9 of the 12 bird species highlighted in the report are either similar or increasing in count numbers for the period examined. The bird are having no problem.
This report is a perfect example of what has happened to SCIENCE!
The same exact goes for the Global Warming Swindle!
Posted by: nofreewind | July 19, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Dear Maine Birder, We have state average temperatures from NOAA that go back to 1895 for the 48 contiguous states. We graphed January temperatures from 1967 through 2007. January of 2007 was the warmest of them all. Here in DC we had flowers blooming until January 20 when we had our first winter weather of the season. This year is a lot colder, but will the cold last through February like it used to?
The birds track annual variations in temperature, so in warmer winters they are found farther north and in colder winters they are found farther south. In states that warmed the most, the birds moved the most. We have several other correlations like this that demonstrate that birds are moving in response to temperature.
Our study found that birds respond to winter temperatures and that has probably always been true. Our concern about the future is the prediction by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) that global warming will continue into the future unless we curb greenhouse gases. This is a consensus document by the best climate scientists on the planet. They may be wrong, but my money's with them.
Posted by: Greg Butcher | February 10, 2009 at 08:15 PM
If these numbers of birds are moving north because of global warming, why haven't they moved back towards the south since temperatures have cooled considerably in the last few years?
For more than 7500 of the last 10000 years, temperatures have been higher than today. Did the birds make this shift during these years? The last 7 years alone have been cooler than the period of "warmth" during the 1990's and early 2000.
I am just trying to understand why this movement is linked to global warming. Maybe the birds are just evolving.
Posted by: MaineBirder | February 10, 2009 at 03:22 PM